Voice interfaces are giving people who have difficulty using graphic-based systems more access to information and services on the Internet. However, there hasn’t been a widely-acknowledged definition of accessibility in this research field. While progress in voice-interface technologies do improve people’s user experience, privacy issues arise and contradict with the nature of accessibility in many cases. In our extended abstract, we try to propose a definition of accessibility from a quality-aware perspective. Accessibility (as generally defined), usability, personalization, confidence and privacy are adopted as five metrics for evaluating quality-aware accessibility. Privacy issues are given special attention when we pursue better accessibility. Real-world experimental platforms can be built under this guidance later on.
Comments: 4 Pages. extended abstract
[v1] 2018-10-12 20:06:32
Unique-IP document downloads: 32 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.