General Mathematics

   

Riemann’s Functional Equation is Not a Valid Function and Its Implication on the Riemann Hypothesis

Authors: Armando M. Evangelista Jr.

Riemann’s functional equation was formulated by Riemann himself in order to extend the domain of the zeta function from the right half-plane into the entire complex plane except at s = 1. It also lead him to find a real function, so that, at s = ½ + ωi, the real function has zeros for some values of ω. Now, the real function was also related to the zeta function, which in turn has something to do with the distribution of prime numbers. This drove him to developed a formula of relating the zeros of the zeta function to the number of primes given a certain number. Riemann then conjectured that all the zeros of the zeta function are at s = ½ + ωi, which is now known as the Riemann Hypothesis. Hence, Riemann’s functional equation is the foundation upon which the Riemann Hypothesis is based. But, there is one problem, the function as shall be shown here, suffers from not being able to yield meaningful or valid values, as it should. Also, if one carefully examine on how Riemann arrived at his formula, I for one, found it to be unsatisfactory or unconvincing. It is, therefore, the aim of this present work to show, that, if carefully examined, Riemann’s functional equation could not be a valid function, and consequently, the Riemann Hypothesis crumbles on its claim.

Comments: 10 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-08-28 11:37:38

Unique-IP document downloads: 19 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus