General Mathematics


Refutation of Quinary Logic in Neutrosophy © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved.

Authors: Colin James III

From the equations as rendered, the notion of ambiguity A (0.5,0.5) is not tautologous but rather truthity. Remark: The abstract of the captioned paper introduces the modal words of possibility and necessity which unfortunately are not mentioned in the text. We conclude that there is no provision in the neutrosophic cube to introduce modal operators. Because neutrosophy has no bivalent square of opposition, but rather a non-bivalent lozenge with a multiple-defined midpoint, the quantified operators are prohibited from definition and hence are disparate from neutrosophy. This means neutrosophic logic is unable to map and support modal or alethic logic.

Comments: 1 Page. © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. info@cec-services dot com

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-05-02 22:35:09

Unique-IP document downloads: 10 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus