General Science and Philosophy


Refutation of Hegel's Dialectical Method © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved.

Authors: Colin James III

Three equations as rendered are tautologous and six are not tautologous, with three of those as contradictions. The definition of Being-for-itself in so called State 3 is a contradiction. Subsequently the main results for Stages 4, 5, and 6 are not tautologous. We conclude that this refutes Hegel's dialectical method, and in only one variable.

Comments: 2 Pages. © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. info@cec-services dot com

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-05-03 06:34:55

Unique-IP document downloads: 24 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus