Authors: Sjaak Uitterdijk
The atomic mass unit has already been applied for more than 200 years. The problem is that the amu now-a-days has been defined in two different ways: the Newtonian one and the one based on present physics by applying the magic energy mc2 and the magic atomic nuclear forces, interpreted as nuclear binding energy. This energy is posited as equal to mc2, without any motivation and as such violating the law of mass conservation.
Comments: 3 Pages. Version 2 and 3 show that the definition of the amu is wrong, not its application, as presented in version 1.
Unique-IP document downloads: 90 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.