Classical Physics


Theory of Nature in Definitions and Formulas \\\ Теория Природы в определениях и формулах

Authors: Robert Yusupov

In this article, an attempt is made to present in a single article the author's view on the axiomatic construction of the foundations of physics. "Theory of Nature" of the author, the first version of which was ready 6 years ago in 2013, in its essence, is an axiomatic theory of the foundations of the universe, nature and the Universe. "Theory of Nature" actually, and not in words, puts matter at the center of all physics. Matter is introduced into the bosom of physics as the main physical quantity. Because of this, it is possible to build a building of physics, as a strictly axiomatic theory. "Theory of Nature" is a revolution in physics.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ В настоящей статье предпринята попытка изложить в единой статье взгляд автора на аксиоматическое построение основ физики. «Теория Природы» (ТП) автора, первый вариант которой был готов 6 лет назад в 2013 году, по своей сути, представляет собой аксиоматическую теорию основ мироздания, природы и Вселенной. «Теория Природы» фактически, а не на словах, ставит материю во главу угла во всей физике. Материя вводится в лоно физики в качестве основной физической величины. Вследствие этого и удаётся построить здание физики, как строго аксиоматическую теорию. «Теория Природы» - это революция в физике.

Comments: 30 Pages. In Russian\ \ Robert Yusupov © Theory of Nature in Definitions and Formulas 30.01.2018

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-01-31 05:55:07

Unique-IP document downloads: 102 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus