Relativity and Cosmology


Alternative Physical Interpretation of Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory

Authors: Anatoly V. Mamaev

An alternative interpretation of Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory is offered based upon the only relativity principle in Galileo’s formulation and the second Einstein’s postulate is cut by Occam’s sickle as superfluous. Instead of Einstein’s second postulate a theorem is proved, which is a consequence from the relativity postulate, about equality of time measurement units for two light clocks of identical design moving each with respect to another one uniformly and rectilinearly. The proof is based upon a newly introduced concept of light speed in a moving inertial reference frame. That equality of time measurement units converts the Einstein’s theorem about moving clock retardation with respect to a stationary clock into an erroneous statement. Transformation is derived for events space-time coordinates from one inertial frame to another one with non-invariant light speed. In this interpretation superlight speeds of motion are not forbidden, the value of a moving particle mass does not depend on the value of the particle speed, but a value of the moving particle charge does depend upon the value of its speed. This interpretation provides absolutely new explanation of supernovas and all astronomical phenomena leading to refusal from Bing Bang hypothesis, “accelerated expansion of the Universe”, from “dark matter” and from “dark energy”.

Comments: 22 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-01-19 12:28:27
[v2] 2018-01-24 11:14:35
[v3] 2018-02-03 04:46:35

Unique-IP document downloads: 37 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus