Set Theory and Logic


Refutation of Neutrosophic Soft Lattice Theory © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved.

Authors: Colin James III

We evaluate the neutrosophic logic based on its most atomic level of soft latices, as published by Springer-Verlag in 2016. We refute the theorem "Every neutrosophic soft lattice is a one-sided distributive neutrosophic soft lattice." This brief evaluation implies that the field of soft set theory as originally introduced by D. Molodtsov is suspicious and specifically that the field of neutrosophic logic, as evidenced in its basis of soft set theory, is unworkable. This conclusion is multitudinal because of the plethora of duplicated papers as translations in multiple fields at regarding the neutrosophic logic system of Florentin Smarandache.

Comments: 2 Pages. Papers by and relating to Florentin Smaradnache span many areas at viXra, but the appropriate field is Set Theory and Logic. Many of them are translated as crude ruse to garner publicity. The study neutrosohic logic is mostly specious.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-01-19 16:14:43

Unique-IP document downloads: 28 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus