Authors: Robert Bennett
Abstract Newton’s Bucket has been an enigma since being published in the Principia in 1687. It was the source of debate between Newton’s absolute space and Ernst Mach’s concept of relative rotation with respect to distant objects. Wikipedia’s rendition of the Bucket argument provides no solution but just confusion by ignoring some basic facts which will be pointed out in the detailed edits below. •Relativity is assumed true instead of being proven true •Kinematics and dynamics are not distinguished •Arguing against discarded theories is pointless •Switching reference frames during observations is fatal •Missing the crucial role of the lab frame •Fictitious forces are symbols of fictitious physics. The key is to recognize that: water at rest in the bucket frame => no rotation => no centrifugal force => no covariance => laws of dynamics are invalid in a non-lab frame.
Comments: 4 Pages.
[v1] 2018-01-11 22:19:15
Unique-IP document downloads: 19 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.