Comments on The Pitzer Equations Formulated on the Assumption of Complete Dissociation of Strong Electrolytes

Authors: Raji Heyrovska

In the past years many articles have been pub¬lished in JPCRD which are based on the Pitzer equations formulated on the assumption of complete dissociation of strong electrolytes at all concentrations. However, in this current author’s opinion, these equations are so complex that they suggest that mere is some concep¬tual error. To quote some articles in Chemistry in Britain, Franks points out that “tinkering with the Debye-Hückel equation may produce better fits to experimental data over increasingly wider ranges of concentration, but it is only a curve fitting exercise." According to this current author, the above complex state of the mathematical description of the solution properties is due to the conventional assumption that strong electrolytes are completely dissociated in aqueous solutions. In recent years, it has been shown by the present author that strong electrolytes are indeed only partially dissociated in aqueous solutions, and this has been confirmed experimentally and supported by molecular dynamic simulations for saturated solutions.

Comments: 3 Pages. This short paper was accepted for publication in JPCRD, but its publication was stopped by NIST after it was proof-read. Over the years it has proved to be correct; see Structural Chem. 24 (2013) 1895-1901; DOI 10.1007/s11224-013-0256-7.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-12-01 10:54:44

Unique-IP document downloads: 52 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus