Set Theory and Logic

   

Definition of the Zero Knowledge Proof Refuted © Copyright 2017 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved.

Authors: Colin James III

The formal definition of the zero-knowledge proof as rendered is not tautologous. What follows is the assumption that in NP all problems and all languages have zero-knowledge proofs is mistaken. What also follows is that one-way functions do not exist.

Comments: 1 Page. © Copyright 2017 by Colin James III All rights reserved.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-11-28 22:51:13

Unique-IP document downloads: 11 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus