Authors: Victor Paromov
The Standard Model (SM) is the most useful theory of elementary particle interactions. Unfortunately, the SM cannot be unified with the theory of general relativity (GR) and has a number of ad hoc parameters. The full unification “beyond the SM” presents an important problem of modern theoretical physics. The SM analysis from the materialistic positions shows a number of fundamental inconsistencies of great philosophical significance. In addition to the long-debated philosophical problems of quantum mechanics, the SM has a problem of the “composite” elementary particles. If elementary, a particle should be stable and “unbreakable”, which is not the case with the five quarks, two leptons, three weak bosons, and the Higg’s particle. In addition, the existence of the neutrino raises questions. Thus, it is logical to expect that a successful unification concept will support the reduction of the SM elementary set. Surprisingly, no unification theory so far can support such a reduction, on the contrary, all the mainstream unifications including superstring theories tend to replace the SM set with an increased, not decreased number of elementary components. The modified Einsteinian concept of curved spacetime, the General Principe of Interaction (GPI) proposed recently along with the Fractal spacetime concept (FSC) does support the proposed reduction. The GPI-based unification allows, in general, the understanding of all the four types of interaction with the spacetime geometry. However, the quantum field descriptions of the particle interactions required by the compact extradimensional geometry are in principle incompatible with the classic field descriptions of the gravitation required by the “normal” geometry. Thus, neither a GPI-based theory nor any other theory can bring a full unification within a single theoretical framework. Nevertheless, the GPI-based description of particle interactions will be indispensable for solving the number of important philosophical problems of quantum physics.
Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures
Unique-IP document downloads: 42 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.