Authors: Ziaedin Shafiei
The theory of length contraction was initially proposed to uphold the existence of aether after the surprise null result from Michelson and Morley (M&M) experiment. The theory claimed that any physical object shrinks in the direction of its movement through aether. The theory is accepted by special relativity. It is, however, redefined as the shortening of any physical object in the direction of its movement relative to an observer. This article shows that M&M experiment does not support length contraction, and time dilation, as the theory was not based on all-inclusive analysis of the experiment. In fact, the distance travelled by the half-silvered mirror was not examined in the experiment to find out it does not agree with length contraction. Subsequently, the constancy of the speed of light becomes uncorroborated by the experiment.
Comments: 11 pages - Version 1.2
Unique-IP document downloads: 56 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.