Relativity and Cosmology

   

Theory of Everything = Philosophy of Everything + Physics of Everything (Part 2). Unifying Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Metaphysics and Consciousness

Authors: Abed Peerally

It is proposed that traditional science and mathematics, on their own, cannot fully explain physical realities, and therefore the ultimate nature of quantum theory and of Einstein’s relativity laws, and their integration. A Theory of Everything of our universe, according to many physicists, might be the ultimate concept of physics, capable of elucidating all scientific and natural realities, but nature appears to be perpetually mysterious and elusive. This article indicates that we require a higher level multi-dimensional physics, can take us towards understanding Metaphysics, that would underpin quantum theory, relativity and spacetime. This is an area where String Theory’s mathematics could be applied in abstruse attempts to find new ways to unite space time and extra-dimensions. Why we have an existence, where we appear to be an impossibility in an impossible universe, seems to unconditionally require a higher-level quantum concept connected partially to metaphysics, the only option capable to unravel the Theory of Everything, from which the integration of quantum theory with Einstein’s relativity and consciousness, has a strong potential to surface.

Comments: 35 Pages. REPLACEMENT DUE TO MINOR REVISION

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-09-06 15:00:33
[v2] 2017-09-08 20:04:12
[v3] 2017-09-11 18:58:03

Unique-IP document downloads: 20 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus