An Analysis of Einstein’s Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

Authors: Edward G. Lake

An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein’s Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

Comments: 28 Pages. Added illustrations

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-04-20 09:24:29
[v2] 2017-05-04 10:02:57
[v3] 2017-05-08 10:10:49
[v4] 2017-06-26 09:31:13

Unique-IP document downloads: 442 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus