Number Theory

   

An Introduction to the $n$-Formal Sequents and the Formal Numbers

Authors: A. Zaganidis

In this work, we introduce the $n$-formal sequents and the formal numbers defined with the help of the second order logic. We give many concrete examples of formal numbers and $n$-formal sequents with the Peano's axioms and the axioms of the real numbers. Shortly, a sequent is $n$-formal iff the sequent is composed by some closed hypotheses and a $n$-formal formula (an explicit sub-formula with one free variable which is only true with the unique natural number $n$), and no sub-sequent are composed by some closed sub-hypotheses and a $m$-formal explicit sub-formula with $m>1$. The definition is motivated by the intuition that the ``nature's hypotheses'' do not carry natural numbers or "hidden natural numbers" except for the numbers $0$ and $1$, i.e., they can be used in a $n$-formal sequent. Moreover, we postulate at second order of logic that the ``nature's hypotheses'' are not chosen randomly: the ``nature's hypotheses'' are the only hypotheses which give the largest formal number $N_Z=1497$. The Goldbach's conjecture, the Dubner's conjecture, the Polignac's conjecture, the Firoozbakht's conjecture, the Oppermann's conjecture, the Agoh-Giuga conjecture, the generalized Fermat's conjecture and the Schinzel's hypothesis H are reviewed with this new (second order logic) formal axiom. Finally, three open questions remain: Can we prove that a natural number is not formal? If a formal number $n$ is found with a function symbol $f$ where its outputs values are only $0$ and $1$, can we always replace the function symbol $f$ by a another function symbol $\tilde{f}$ such that $\tilde{f}=1-f$ and the new sequent is still $n$-formal? Does a sequent exist to make a difference between the definition of the $n$-formal sequents and the following variant of that definition: we look at the explicit sub-formulas of $\phi$ which induce the $m$-formal formulas instead of looking at the explicit sub-formulas of $\phi_{n-formal}$ which are $m$-formal formulas?

Comments: 17 Pages. I have chosen the category Mathematics-Number Theory since most of the consequences of the present article are inside the number theory

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-04-03 11:20:53

Unique-IP document downloads: 22 times

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus