Number Theory


Addendum to Paper Entitled "Do Prime Numbers Obey a Three Dimensional Double Helix?"

Authors: Peter Bissonnet

This paper elucidates the major points of the above referenced paper. 1. Emphasizes the derivation of the double helices and that they are not arbitrarily chosen. 2. Explains why multiples of 42 appear in prime number theory. 3. Why s in 6s-1 and 6s+1 is really a composite number. 4. Why 2 and 3 are not true prime numbers based upon characteristics. 5. Philosophical reason as to the double helices falling more into a discoverable category (as in experimental physics), as opposed to being postulate driven.

Comments: 5 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-03-03 10:27:01

Unique-IP document downloads: 40 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus