Relativity and Cosmology

   

Emission Theories and Relativity

Authors: Osvaldo Domann

The present paper compares two different approaches to Relativity. One is the approach made by Einstein at the beginning of the 20th century which postulates that light moves with light speed c independent of its emitting source. The proposed approach postulates that light moves with light speed c relative to its emitting source, which also includes the reflecting and refracting surfaces. Einstein interpreted the constancy of light speed in all inertial frames as a time and space problem resulting time dilation and length contraction, while the new approach considers it a speed problem where time and space are absolute variables. The result of the proposed approach is a theory where particles move according Galilei relativity, and speeds calculated with the transformation equations are virtual speeds that allow the calculation of magnitudes like momentum, energy, Doppler effect, etc., which are not linear functions of the Galilean speeds.

Comments: 16 Pages. Copyright. All rights reserved. The content of the present work, its ideas, axioms, postulates, definitions, derivations, results, findings, etc., can be reproduced only by making clear reference to the name of the author.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2015-12-08 06:04:57
[v2] 2015-12-11 04:46:12
[v3] 2016-02-05 05:31:00
[v4] 2016-04-26 08:36:07
[v5] 2017-02-12 04:07:53
[v6] 2017-06-17 00:39:49

Unique-IP document downloads: 86 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus