Classical Physics


Физика – наука или ремесло?/Is Physics a Science or Craft?

Authors: Robert Yusupov

В настоящей статье исследуется вопрос о научности физики на основе принципов научности теории, сформулированных автором. Принципы научности, по мнению автора неразрывно связаны с природой, с признанием материи основой природы. Критерием научности теории следует считать адекватное отражение природы и ее основы материи в понятийном аппарате теории. Это же конечно предполагает, что есть модель природы, модель мироздания, где определена материя. Это должно быть конкретным представлением материи в природе в чистом виде. Автор предлагает гипотезу, согласно которой материя представляет собой элементарные шарообразные сгустки, крупицы материи, содержащие вполне определенное постоянное минимальное количество материи. Второй основной характеристикой крупицы материи является диаметр. In the present article the question on scientific character of physics on the basis of principles of scientific character of the theory, formulated by the author is investigated. Scientific character principles, according to the author inseparably linked with the nature, with a recognition of a matter as a nature basis. It is necessary to consider as criterion of scientific character of the theory adequate reflection of the nature and its basis of a matter in the conceptual device of the theory. Same certainly assumes that there is a nature model, universe model where the matter is defined. It should be concrete representation of a matter in the nature in the pure state. The author offers a hypothesis according to which the matter represents elementary spherical clots, the particles of a matter containing quite certain constant minimum quantity of a matter. The second basic characteristic of a particle of a matter is diameter.

Comments: 7 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2015-09-02 04:15:45

Unique-IP document downloads: 418 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus