Authors: Robert A. Herrmann
The General Grand Unification (GGU) Model solves a problem personally presented to this author, in 1979, by John A. Wheeler. It answers the question "Is physics legislated by cosmogony?" It is a cosmogony that yields a "Theory of Everything" for any descriptive cosmology. Further, it satisfies certain basic requirements. It shows that "the basic structure is something deeper than geometry and particles (a 'pregeometry')." It answers "the greatest question on the books of Physics. How did our universe come into being? And of what is it made? That is, "of what is the substance out of which the universe made?" "But, is it really imaginable that the deeper structure of physics should govern how the universe is made? Is it not more reasonable to believe the converse, that the requirement that the universe should come into being should govern the structure of physics?" Thus, how the universe comes into being should be distinct from the physical laws the processes satisfy. It also must satisfy the "observer-participator" principle. That is, we not only observe but we change the behavior of the universe through our physical activities. The GGU-model satisfies all of the requirements and, besides its secular interpretation, has two rather philosophic interpretations as well. It is shown how a predicted ultra-logic-system is directly related to the generation of a developmental and hyper-developmental paradigm, which, via GGU-model processes, represent a universe's physical and physical-like events. Such mathematical modeling includes the process of refining the general language used to interpret the symbols.
Comments: 14 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 96 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.