## Jiang and Wiles Who Has First Proved Fermat Last Theorem (5)

**Authors:** Chun-Xuan Jiang

D.Zagier(1984) and K.Inkeri(1990) said[7] Jiang mathematics is true, but Jiang determinates
the irrational numbers to be very difficult for prime exponent p>2.In 1991 Jiang studies the
composite exponents n=15,21,33,...,3p and proves Fermat last theorem for prime exponent
p>3[1].In 1986 Gerhard Frey places Fermat last theorem at elliptic curve ,now called a Frey
curve.Andrew Wiles studies Frey curve.In 1994 Wiles proves Fermat last
theorem[9,10].Conclusion:Jiang proof is direct and very simple,but Wiles proof is indirect and
very complex. If China mathematicians and Academia Sinica had supported and recognized
Jiang proof on Fermat last theorem,Wiles would not have proved Fermat last theorem,because
in 1991 Jiang had proved Fermat last theorem[1].Wiles has received many prizes and awards,
he should thank China mathematicians and Academia Sinica.To support and to publish Jiang
Fermat last theorem paper is prohibited in Academia Sinica.
Remark. Chun-Xuan Jiang,A general proof of Fermat last theorem(Chinese),Mimeograph
papers,July 1978. In this paper using circulant matrix,circulant determinant and permutation
group theory Jiang had proved Fermat last theorem for odd prime exponent. (5)

**Comments:**
14 pages.

**Download:** **PDF**

### Submission history

[v1] 3 Mar 2011

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 49 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary.
In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution.
Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.*

*
*