Relativity and Cosmology


A Derivation of the Geodetic Effect Without Space Curvature

Authors: J. M. Kerr

The ‘curvature component’ is 2/3 of the geodetic effect. This part of the angle through which an orbiting gyroscope moves is thought to be due to space curvature, as in general relativity (GR). There are different interpretations for the other 1/3, some of which apply whether space is curved or flat. Here it is shown that the curvature component 2/3 can alternatively be derived from flat space, if one simply assumes that matter near a mass is slowed by (1 - (2GM/rc^2))^1/2. In Planck scale gravity (PSG), a theory that closely mimics GR, for an orbiting spherical object minor corrections are made to local speeds within the object, at different heights in the field. This leads to a slight turning of the object as it orbits. The result can be generalised as an equation for a single orbit around any spherical mass, which gives the same numbers as GR to many decimal places, but is mathematically different. In the case of one of the gyroscopes on Gravity Probe B, it gives an angle change in the plane of the orbit, in the same direction as the geodetic precession, of 4.4 arcsecs/yr. That is 2/3 of the total geodetic effect, the value of the curvature component. The GR geodetic effect and this equivalent effect are at present indistinguishable by experiment, but PSG can be tested in other ways, such as by interferometer experiments [4].

Comments: 3 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 24 Jan 2008 (removed)
[v2] 2012-07-21 10:20:38

Unique-IP document downloads: 418 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus